“If you can't measure it, you can't improve it.” – Peter Drucker
A few years ago, I decided that
I was working all of the time and ignoring my health. I wanted to get down to what
I weighed in college. I wanted to keep
it off, rather than losing it and gaining it back…so, I knew I had to make some
changes.
As a performance measurement
evangelist, I developed a simple chart to record my daily weight, diet and
exercise, and kept if next to a new scale.
Every morning I would weigh myself and write it down. Every night before going to bed, I would
weigh myself and write it down, as well as what I did for exercise and a
summary of what I ate, if it was beyond my normal intake. I prepared a new sheet for each month, of
course with time-series spark-line and bullet chart graphs.
I was surprised when I achieved
my goal in only a few months. What I
learned was that by reminding myself in the morning and at night what I ate and
how I exercised – or didn’t, I was able to hold myself accountable to achieve
the goal I set for myself. The simple
introduction of timely performance feedback was all I needed. I stopped maintaining my scorecard after
about 1.5 years because I had achieved my goals and adopted the nutrition and
exercise habits that help me stay healthy.
Discounting Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays, I’m about back to my
target weight. J
I share this experience with you
because I’ve seen similar progress happen when organizations start measuring business
activities as they work to achieve a business objective. Here’s what happens:
1.
There is an initial spike in process and outcome
improvement, as employees learn that their work is being measured and everyone can
see how they’re doing, compared to their peers and people in other
locations.
2.
Next, performance feedback is used to identify,
prioritize and resolve performance deficits in processes that directly
contribute to achieving targeted objectives.
3. Finally,
performance feedback helps team leaders and management identify opportunities
for employees to receive knowledge and skills training, so they can continuously
improve the quality, productivity and expense aspects of their work.
Performance goals and measures constantly
evolve as the organization and market change, and new information brings new
insights providing guidance on how to most productively address those changes.
Because many of my clients are banks,
let’s use the example of Customer Service Reps (CSRs) having the goal of
opening ‘n’ New Accounts per month. What
might be the CSR’s activities that generate new accounts to enable them to achieve
their goal? Measuring the calls,
personal contacts, referrals, e-mail messages and other current and prospective
customer “touches,” paints a picture of CSR productivity and effectiveness. Considering the differences in tenure,
training, and other personal attributes, the content and quality of the
customer/prospect contact can be assessed to identify opportunities for
motivation, knowledge and skills development.
Continuous improvement produces high performance.
My own continuous improvement journey
has lead me to discover and explore the teachings of Stacey Barr and Bob Behn,
who both present good knowledge and guidance on how to maximize organizational
performance with performance measurement.
Performance Analytics requires well-defined
performance measures. I recently discovered Stacey Barr, the Performance Measure Specialist, who lives in Australia, and has defined a process for
developing and implementing performance measures.
I invite you to explore Stacey’s PuMP Performance Measure Blueprint Program.
Developing performance measures to guide continuous improvement throughout the organization is the goal. Analytics provide timely, cost-effective performance feedback to contribute to achieving this goal.
I invite you to explore Stacey’s PuMP Performance Measure Blueprint Program.
Developing performance measures to guide continuous improvement throughout the organization is the goal. Analytics provide timely, cost-effective performance feedback to contribute to achieving this goal.
Bob presents his ideas on The Behn Report, where he
examines “…the issues, dilemmas, challenges, and opportunities for improving
performance and producing real results.”
While I have enjoyed reading all of Bob’s papers, the following extract
from his November 2013 paper addresses what I believe are the key topics
related to Performance Analytics.
There is, however, a significant difference between doing
the measurement and doing the management. Furthermore, there is also an
important difference between doing the management tasks and exercising real
performance leadership. These differences are reflected in the operational
questions that each ask:
For performance measurement, the operational question
is: How can we measure what we are doing?
For performance management, the operational question
is: What are our more significant “performance deficits,” and what is our
strategy for eliminating or mitigating a few of the most important ones?
For performance leadership, the operational question
is: How do we motivate everyone in our organization —and our collaborators, too
—to pursue our strategy with intelligence, creativity, and persistence, and
thus to eliminate these few important performance deficits?
Bob’s questions assume that
organizations have the Analytics technologies and processes in place to capture
performance measurement data, organize and analyze the data, and provide timely
performance feedback across the organization…which is not always the case. In addition, are organization’s leaders
trained to use performance feedback to understand where employees need training
and development to address performance deficits?
Sustained high performance
requires effective performance measurement, management and leadership supported
by an enterprise Performance Analytics program.
Progress is being
made, but there is still much to do.